Board Representation: Multiple Interests and Corporate Governance
Authors: Scully, Maureen; Johnson, Jennifer
Source: The Aspen Institute Center for Business Education's Corporate Governance and Accountability Project
Year: 2006
Abstract:
This collection was created by Maureen Scully, Assistant Professor of Management at the University of Massachusetts Boston, and Jennifer Johnson, PhD, of the Aspen Institute Business and Society Program.
What issues are involved in representing multiple interests on boards? Several perspectives on corporate governance allow that shareholders and other stakeholders be taken into account in decisions about corporate strategy and resource allocation. The process of integrating minority concerns into corporate boards is often fraught with challenges.
This collection juxtaposes research from different areas that have bearing on representing multiple interests on boards. The materials are mainly aimed at researchers but may also provide background for classroom discussions:
(1) Research on the role played by union-nominated directors shows how this arrangement aims to represent worker concerns. At the same time, it also sounds a cautionary note about how union-nominated directors struggle for a legitimate place and can come to be perceived as either too beholden to labor or too beholden to management.
(2) Boards that reserve a seat for a specific interest might take note of the findings in political economics about redistricting to create "minority-majority" districts, essentially holding a seat in the legislature for that minority group. Findings show that minority interests can end up less well represented in legislative decisions than when majority group representatives had to consider minority concerns in order to get that slice of the vote in their districts. While boards are not representative in the same sense as legislatures, the idea that minority concerns may be best served when responsibility for specific interests is diffused across board members, not relegated to one seat, is instructive.
(3) A newly-released study of women on boards shows that having three women on a board is the "critical mass" at which women's contributions noticeably shift board discussions. Findings showed that women were more likely to raise sustained concern about employees, customers, and the wider community.
From three distinct angles, these studies address both the benefits and limits of having particular board members represent distinct interests. Ultimately, all board members need to be able to articulate and weigh the trade-offs among shareholders and key stakeholders. We invite CasePlace.org visitors to contribute to this new discussion of the process of representing multiple interests on corporate boards.
Related Documents
Web-Conference: Beyond Shareholders: Representing Multiple Views in Board Deliberations
Author(s): Konrad, Alison; Scully, Maureen; CasePlace.org
Product Type: Multimedia
This Web-Conference featured Dr. Alison Konrad, Professor of Organizational Behavior and Corus Entertainment Chair in Women in Management at the Richard Ivey School of Business, as she discussed how boards of directors might bring multiple views into their deliberations and governance.
Corporate Governance
Author(s): Kogut, Bruce; Paille, Stéphanie
Product Type: Syllabi
This course focuses on the relationship between institutions of corporate governance and the economic performance of corporate enterprises.
Critical Mass on Corporate Boards
Author(s): Kramer, Vicki W.; Konrad, Alison M.; Erkut, Sumru
Product Type: Research Notes / Working Papers
Although numerous articles make a case for diversity on boards and scholars have begun to focus on women on boards, the Critical Mass project is the first research study to examine multiple perspectives on the impact of the number of women on corporate boards of directors.
Union-Nominated Directors: A New Voice in Corporate Governance
Author(s): McKersie, Robert B.
Product Type: Books / Book Chapters
The nature of the American corporation in general, and corporate governance in particular, is a subject of considerable debate today. Some of this debate is playing out in practice as firms explore alternative ways to meet the needs of both traditional shareholders and other stakeholders. The purpose of this chapter is to report on one such nascent development -- the role of union-nominated directors (UNDs) on boards of American companies...
A Social Science Approach to Race, Redistricting, and Representation
Author(s): Epstein, David; O'Halloran, Sharyn
Product Type: Journal Articles
In his critique of our earlier paper on majority-minority voting districts, David Lublin suggests that our conclusions with respect to the election of minorities to office are flawed, and that we incorrectly estimate optimal districting strategies for the substantive representation of minority interests in Congress. Subjecting these claims to direct empirical examination, we find that our previous results are unaltered by the inclusion of Latino voters in our estimates of equal opportunity, and that incumbency advantage cannot fully explain the recent victories of minority candidates in the South...
Worker Representation on Boards of Directors
Author(s): Hammer, Tove H; Currall, Steven C.; Stern, Robert N.
Product Type: Journal Articles
The study examines worker representation on boards of directors as a form of employee participation in organizational decision-making in 14 U.S. firms in the early 1980s. The authors develop a model of worker director role definitions and role performance to explain how opposition by managers and conventional board directors to labor advocacy on the board can make worker directorships ineffective labor voice mechanisms when other structures of participation are absent in a firm.
The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests In Congress
Author(s): Lublin, David
Product Type: Books / Book Chapters
In The Paradox of Representation David Lublin offers an unprecedented analysis of a vast range of rigorous, empirical evidence that exposes the central paradox of racial representation: Racial redistricting remains vital to the election of African Americans and Latinos but makes Congress less likely to adopt policies favored by blacks...
Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress
Author(s): Epstein, David; O'Halloran, Sharyn; Cameron, Charles
Product Type: Journal Articles
Majority-minority voting districts have been advanced as a remedy to the underrepresentation of minority interests in the political process. Yet, their efficacy in furthering the substantive goals of minority constituents has been questioned because they may dilute minority influence in surrounding areas and lead to an overall decrease in support for minority-sponsored legislation...